Blog #3: God of the Oppressed
Today, Professor Datcher posed an
important question. His question was something along the lines of: Do all
people share the same image of god? Majority of the class agreed that most
people have a different perception of god, but no one was able to thoroughly
explain why at that exact moment. I felt as if I had a compelling argument, but
for the sake of time I chose to hold off and layout my beliefs in this week’s
blog post.
I asked my sister in law, who is
Mexican, to answer Datcher’s question. Leslie responded, “We can’t all share
the same God because we all go through different things.” I then asked her to expand on that, and she
replied, “What do you mean? It’s self explanatory.” Like Leslie, a lot of
people address the difference in historical backgrounds on the surface level,
but never dive deeper into the discussion. Therefore, I’d like to use the
remaining 534 words to do so.
Not all people share the same image of God. Different
groups of people experience and view God differently as a result of history.
The racial tension between black and white people is the perfect representation
of this theory. In Sisters in Wilderness,
Sarah Williams discusses the story of Sarah and Hagar. Hagar is a black
slave and Sarah is a white housewife. Hagar and Sarah
held similar beliefs in terms of religion, but experienced God differently
because of race. On page 150 Williams writes, “The reality of suffering and
evil challenges the affirmation that God is liberating the oppressed from human
captivity. If God is unlimited in both power and goodness, as the Christian
faith claims, why does God not destroy the powers of evil through the
establishment of divine righteousness? If God is the one who liberated Israel
from Egyptian slavery, who appeared in Jesus as the healer of the sick and the
helper of the poor, and who is present today as the Holy spirit of liberation,
then why are black people still living in wretched conditions without the
economic and political power to determine their historical destiny?,” (Williams
150). Hagar had trouble believing God wanted the best for her because he was
also the God of her oppressor. In the text Hagar and Sarah share the same God,
but Hagar doesn’t feel represented or protected. The same God that allowed
Sarah and Abraham to exile her is the same God telling her to return to them.
Therefore, when speaking to God the two can’t be referring to the same image
because they are speaking from different positions.
James Cone’s
racial background also shapes his personal experiences with God. In God of the Oppressed, Cone talks about
the importance of the black church. As a child Cone attempted to attend a white
church, and although they never out right said he did not belong, he could feel
that his presence was unwanted, leading him to the black church. Being black
made Cone’s experience with God very personal. In the black church he grew extremely
close to God because through God he was given strength. God represented the
oppressed, which Cone was. Cone’s experience of God differed from whites in all
aspects, but mostly in prayer. On page 18 Cone states, “Black prayers are not
the same as white prayers,” (Cone 18). Whites pray to God in a position of
authority, and they ask for more wealth or prosperity. Blacks on the other hand
pray to God in hopes of freedom and empowerment. In black prayer the people
pour their heart and soul out to God because they are speaking from a position
of inferiority. The people look towards God to guide them to be what they were
destined to be. Cone believes that there are different realities when referring
to God because he does not feel represented through the white Jesus.
In conclusion,
all people experience and view God differently. Every individual has a
personalized image of God because we view him from different positions and
social standings.
No comments:
Post a Comment